Use of ozone therapy in the treatment of low back pain: a meta-analysis study

Authors

  • Maria Gloria Vicente
  • Leidy Anne Alves Teixeira Anvisa/Brasília
  • Claudia Cristina de Aguiar Pereira Anvisa/Brasília
  • Erika Barbosa Camargo Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51723/ccs.v31i02.588

Keywords:

Low back pain, Ozone therapy, Ozone

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of ozone therapy in reducing pain and quality of life in patients with low back pain. Methods: the search for evidence was carried out on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Cochrane Libary and BIREME databases for the structured question. Results: treatment with conventional therapies was more favorable than ozone therapy. The control and experimental groups evolved to improve low back pain and did not show significant differences between them. Conclusion: there is no strong recommendation evidence in favor of the technology. However, there is also no evidence that it is an unsafe technology. Further studies are needed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Frasson VB. Dor lombar: como tratar? In: (OPAS) OP de S, editor. Uso Racional de Medicamentos: fundamentação em condutas terapêuticas e nos macroprocessos da Assistência Farmacêutica. Vol 1. No. Brasília: 2016; 2016.
2. Nascimento PRC do, Costa LOP. Prevalência da dor lombar no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática. Cadernos de Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2015 Jun;31(6):1141–56. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2015000601141&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=
3. Corrêa CPS, Guedes IO, Vieira MT, Muniz MNM. Método Pilates versus Escola de Postura: Análise comparativa de dois protocolos de tratamento para lombalgias. HU Revista. 2015;
4. Zanuto EAC, Codogno JS, Christófaro DGD, Vanderlei LCM, Cardoso JR, Fernandes RA, et al. Prevalence of low back pain and associated factors in adults from a middle-size Brazilian city. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva [Internet]. 2015 May [cited 2018 Oct 17];20(5):1575–82. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000501575&lng=en&tlng=en
5. Malta DC, Oliveira MM de, Andrade SSC de A, Caiaffa WT, Souza M de FM de, Bernal RTI, et al. Factors associated with chronic back pain in adults in Brazil. Revista de Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Oct 17];51(suppl 1). Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000200309&lng=en&tlng=en
6. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e. Pesquisa nacional de saúde : 2013 : percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida e doenças crônicas : Brasil, grandes regiões e unidades da federação. 2014;180. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/pns/2013/default.shtm
7. Cruz-Sánchez E de la, Torres-Bonete MD, García-Pallarés J, Gascón-Cánovas JJ, Valero-Valenzuela A, Pereñíguez-Barranco JE. Dolor de espalda y limitación de la actividad física cotidiana en la población adulta española. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra [Internet]. 2012 Aug;35(2):241–9. Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1137-66272012000200006&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
8. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Agans RP, Jackman AM, Darter JD, Wallace AS, et al. The Rising Prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain. Archives of Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2009 Feb 9;169(3):251. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19204216%0Awww.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4339077
9. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. The Lancet [Internet]. 1999 Aug;354(9178):581–5. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673699013124
10. Anvisa. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada - RDC no 185 de 21 de outubro de 2001 [Internet]. Brasil: Diário no Oficial da União (DOU) de 24 de outubro de 2001; Número 201. Seção 1; 2001. p. 54. Available from: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/legislacao#/visualizar/26788
11. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2007;7(1):1–7.
12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ. 2009;(339):b2525.
13. Oliveira JR, José Oswaldo de; Lages GV. Ozonioterapia em lombociatalgia. Rev dor Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor. 2012;13(3):261–70.
14. Teh J, Ostlere S. Percutaneous spinal procedures. Imaging. 2005;17(3):258–67.
15. Staal JB, De Bie R, De Vet HCW, Hildebrandt J, Nelemans P. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008;(3).
16. Steppan, Jim; Meaders, Thomas; Muto, Mario; Murphy K. A Metaanalysis of teh Effectiveness and Safety of Ozone Treatments for Herniated Lumbar Discs. JVIR. 2010;21(4):534–48.
17. Magalhães, Francisco de Oliveira; Dotta, Luciana; Sasse, André; Teixeira, Manuel J; Fonoff ET. Ozone Therapy as a Treatment for Low Back Pain Secondary to Herniate Disc: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain physician. 2012;15(2150–1149):E115–29.

Published

2020-10-02

How to Cite

1.
Maria Gloria Vicente, Leidy Anne Alves Teixeira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar Pereira, Barbosa Camargo E. Use of ozone therapy in the treatment of low back pain: a meta-analysis study. Com. Ciências Saúde [Internet]. 2020 Oct. 2 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];31(02):55-64. Available from: https://revistaccs.escs.edu.br/index.php/comunicacaoemcienciasdasaude/article/view/588

Issue

Section

Mestrados profissionais em saúde

Most read articles by the same author(s)